Superpowered Minors, Part One

One topic that we’ve been asked about by several people is the issue of superpowered minors, whether acting as superheroes or supervillains.  There are many examples, such as the Teen Titans, young mutants like Kitty Pryde, and Spider-Man (in his younger days). This post, the first in a series, is about the minors themselves and their criminal liability.  Future posts will cover torts and contracts.  The legal issues involving their parents, guardians (like Bruce Wayne), and school teachers (like Professor X) will also be addressed in future installments.

Continue reading

Supers and Social Security

Almost every American old enough to read has at least heard of Social Security, and with good reason: it’s been a massive part of the United States’ social safety net for three quarters of a century. The program is so ubiquitous that Social Security Numbers (“SSNs”) have become one of the primary ways that United States citizens identify themselves in official proceedings and transactions with the government.

So how would the community of superheroes and other meta-humans interact with this massive legal edifice? A lot of that is going to depend on just how open a character wants to be about their identity.

I. Social Security Numbers

One’s SSN is intimately connected to one’s legal identity. It is a unique identifier associated with one’s legal status, and without one (or a Taxpayer Identification Number), the federal government isn’t necessarily going to be totally sure that you exist, bureaucratically speaking. It’s how taxes are tracked, and it’s very difficult to engage in even the most routine government transactions without one. The statute which creates them is 42 U.S.C. § 405.

All of which conspires to make the SSN an essential part of constructing an alter ego. Of course, forging them is a crime, and just running the numbers there’s a one in three chance that whatever number you just make up is going to be currently in use by someone else (though it’s actually even greater than that given the rules for valid SSNs).

II. Taxes

The other completely ubiquitous part of Social Security is taxes. Social Security taxes are imposed by the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, better known as FICA, and codified at 26 U.S.C. §§ 3101—3128. At the moment, the Social Security tax rate is 6.2% of gross income, plus another 6.2% contributed by employers, so really 12.4%, only you never even see half of it. The self-employed must pay both halves out of their own pocket, hence self-employment taxes, but the difference is more one of perception than reality.

Either way, if you make money by working, i.e. you earn a wage or salary, the government wants its cut, and the IRS doesn’t much care who you are. To quote the Joker from a late Golden Age/early Silver Age story, “I’m crazy enough to take on Batman, but the IRS? No, thank you!” If you’re earning money, and it’s more than a couple of grand a year, the IRS will eventually find out. So unless a character is independently wealthy–which means he’ll be paying taxes in other ways, just not FICA–it’s going to be very, very hard to evade Social Security taxes for very long.

III. Benefits

Then there’s the question of benefits. Right now, every American over the age of 67 (lower in some cases) can collect old-age benefits. Fair enough. But the actuarial tables for calculating benefits, taxes, budgets, etc. are predicated on most people dying within a decade of their seventy-fifth (or so) birthday. Wolverine could theoretically have been collecting Social Security–assuming he got his citizenship status worked out–almost since the program was inaugurated!

This is problematic for two reasons. One, when the government is cutting you a check every month, that’s one more month where someone might notice that you’re still around. A situation in Japan where hundreds of elderly people collecting old-age pensions were discovered to be missing, sometimes for decades, illustrates that while the machinery of bureaucracy does have a lot of inertia, people living beyond their nineties is still quite unusual and does raise red flags. (It also may help explain why the Japanese life expectancy is so high; maybe they simply aren’t recording deaths. But that’s neither here nor there.) So a character who is either immortal or has a longer than normal lifespan will almost certainly get noticed sooner or later. Whether or not the character minds is dependent upon the facts of their particular story, but this could be problematic for many characters.

But second, Social Security was intended as a sort of last-resort measure to prevent the elderly from becoming destitute. It doesn’t really work that way anymore, as those people who have to rely solely upon Social Security pretty much are destitute, and plenty of people who don’t need the money at all still collect benefits for decades, but that’s still the theory. The discovery of a group of people who aren’t going to die at all, or who at best are going to collect benefits for fifty plus years is likely to encourage Congress to take a long, hard look at establishing some kind of limitation on the ability of people to collect benefits forever. Depending on just how bad the budgetary situation is at that time, this could be as little as a fix to exclude the truly immortal or as draconian as limiting benefits to three decades for everyone. But some kind of Congressional action does seem pretty likely, and the existence of immortals among us might just be sufficiently distressing to the American population to give Congress the inertia it needs to actually do something about the program’s bleeding balance sheet.

The fact that even in the stories that contain the largest number of immortal beings–Highlander, anyone?–there are little more than a few hundred in the entire world is not likely to mitigate this fear either. The American media and populace are terrible at issues of scale. This, of course, is just one more reason immortals might want to keep their existence hidden, which means taking pains to conceal their longevity and identity. Simply declining to accept the benefits is probably insufficient to head off Congressional action too, since not every immortal is likely to be so charitable.

IV. Conclusion

In addition to the critical nature of SSNs in today’s increasingly connected and bureaucratic society, Social Security–and similar programs–represents a massive legal machine which superheroes must at least contemplate if they are to exist in society, especially if they are immortal or extremely long-lived. Thought must be given to the way they approach the identification, taxation, and benefits issues presented by the program.

Superhero Privacy Rights, Part Three

In the first two installments of this series we discussed the invasion of privacy torts of intrusion and disclosure.  This post will address the tort of appropriation and the closely related right of publicity.  Since the two are closely related, let’s begin by distinguishing them.

Here’s how the Nevada Supreme Court distinguished them in PETA v. Bobby Berosini, Ltd., 895 P.2d 1269 (Sup. Ct. Nev. 1995):

The distinction between these two torts is the interest each seeks to protect. The appropriation tort seeks to protect an individual’s personal interest in privacy; the personal injury is measured in terms of the mental anguish that results from the appropriation of an ordinary individual’s identity. The right to publicity seeks to protect the property interest that a celebrity has in his or her name; the injury is not to personal privacy, it is the economic loss a celebrity suffers when someone else interferes with the property interest that he or she has in his or her name. We consider it critical in deciding this case that recognition be given to the difference between the personal, injured-feelings quality involved in the appropriation privacy tort and the property, commercial value quality involved in the right of publicity tort.

Although damages are measured differently for the two torts, the relief ultimately boils down to the same thing: money damages and (probably) an injunction forbidding future appropriation or violation of the right of publicity.

Continue reading

Law and the Multiverse Mailbag II

In this week’s mailbag we look at three questions from our email that touch on alternate universes, jurisdiction over crimes committed in the Phantom Zone, and contracts.  As always, if you have questions or post suggestions, please send them to james@lawandthemultiverse.com and ryan@lawandthemultiverse.com.

Continue reading

Superheroes and Flying II: Flight Plans and Air Traffic Control

Last week we looked at some of the first-order questions about flying superheroes. Specifically, we examined whether it would be safe to have such people in the air at all (probably) and the registration requirements as they apply to various characters (Superman is probably okay, but Batman is going to have trouble here.).

This week, we’re looking at some of the legal mechanics involved in actually flying. Specifically, the issues of flight planning and dealing with air traffic control.

Continue reading

Costumes and the Confrontation Clause

One question that we get frequently here on Law and the Multiverse is whether superheroes that wear identity-concealing costumes could wear them in court.  A closely related question is whether a superhero could testify under his or her alias and refuse to answer questions about his or her secret identity.  In the US, these are important issues because of the Confrontation Clause, which is where our analysis will focus. We briefly discussed this issue as part of the alter ego post from Dec. 2010; this is a fuller treatment of the specific question of the legal issues related to testifying while disguised.

Continue reading

Tron: Legacy

When we watch movies, we necessarily engage in at least some suspension of disbelief. That’s why we’re there. But when you’re an expert in a particular field, and Hollywood plays free and loose with the rules of that field–or occasionally gets them right!–you tend to notice. Physicists have been reviewing movies for their scientific accuracy for a while now. This is the first in a series of posts where we analyze the legal content of movies likely to appeal to comic book fans.

Tron: Legacy, sequel to the classic, raises a few interesting legal points. This is not intended to be a review of the movie but rather a quick brief on some of these issues. There are some spoilers though, so you have been warned.

Continue reading

Mind Control Made Me Do It

Some supervillains (e.g., Gorilla Grodd, The Puppeteer) have the ability to control others through mental powers, hypno-rays, or the like.  But if they forced you to commit a crime, would you still be liable?  And would you have any claim against them?  The short answers are no and yes, respectively.

[Note: ‘No and yes’ were reversed when this first went up.  Law and the Multiverse regrets the error.]

Continue reading

Supers and the Eighth Amendment

The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows:

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The last phrase, “cruel and unusual punishment,” has a long jurisprudence extending back even before ratification of the Constitution. The phrase appears in the English Bill of Rights which was a key legal step in effecting the Glorious Revolution, and the Eighth Amendment in particular has been a major cause of the gradual reduction in the physical severity of judicial punishments in American history. Today, no state inflicts direct corporal punishment other than capital punishment, whereas as recently as the twentieth century, states were sentencing convicts to hard labor.

All of this may be interesting in its own right, but we’re only talking about it because we want to know whether it would be “cruel and unusual” to, say, sentence an immortal being like Apocalypse to life without the possibility of parole (LWOP).

Continue reading

Superhero Privacy Rights, Part Two

In a prior post we discussed the first of the four privacy torts, intrusion.  In this post we will move on to the public disclosure of private facts.  In particular, we’re interested in whether the public disclosure of the private fact of a superhero’s secret identity would give rise to a tort claim.  Unfortunately, in most cases it probably would not.

Continue reading